I scored countries that have been to the WC since 1954. That chart can be seen by clicking here. Below show how points have been allocated. 'Totals' are the points for each tournament. Then matches and average points per match, which has remained reasonably similar.
What has dropped is the percentage for the winner, from 22% to 8%. Points for teams not making the quarter finals are the reason. As their number has swelled, so too the percentage, fom 17% to 61%.
Moving on to how regions have gone. The number of nations went up by 45.5% in 2026. The number of nations participating regionally, Europe went up numerically 23%, Americas 50%, East/Pacific 67% and Africa 100%.
As for points won, East/Pacific went up just 12.5%, Europe up 68%, Americas 74% and Africa 153%.
The gap between the extra nations and points gained by region were East/Pacific a terrible -54%, Americas a modest +24%, Europe a sound +45% and Africa a buoyant +53%.
Europe is the most successful region but is getting less allocations. Its percentage points are down to 44% of the total. Yet the above shows that the success is the second highest if comparing points won with the allocations by percentage. Europe was not given sufficient spots considering the quality of football there.
America's very generous 12 nation allocation for 2026 did achieved more points but was third on the metric of improvement per team. Surely they don't need more nations.
Africa had its number of participants doubled and grew the most, so allocating more spots was a successful move. More spots will surely follow.
East/Pacific was a disaster. 6 to 10 teams didn't work on the field. However, with the population that region covers, I'm sure FIFA is eyeing the revenue potential and will want more allocations from here.
If you want clarification of what I wrote, please leave a comment and I will answer.