Friday 5 July 2024

UEFA Euros : 1964 to 2024

 The 2024 Euros are on and here is a progress report of what has happened now the group stage is completed. What can we make of proceedings so far?


A: The hosts moved smoothly into the next stage with Switzerland. The other two teams didn't really look like progressing. Scotland's first up match was a horror show but they changed things and regained some respectability. 17 goals (av 2.8).

B: This was a carbon copy of Group 1 with two sides better than the others. That said. Italy wasn't all that convincing and the niggling Croatian team could have progressed but thankfully didn't. Albania tried hard. 14 goals (av 2.3).

C: Some tournaments have a group of death but this was a group of boring. No games featured more than one goal per team or two per game. England cautiously tip toed through which impressed few. Denmark and Slovenia were resolute defensively. 7 goals (av 1.2).

D: France was the only unbeaten side and favourite but two draws consigned them to second place. Austria was impressive and deservedly won the group after losing the first match. The Netherlands was average and Poland was quite poor. 15 goals (av 2.5).

E: This was an unusually tight group with all teams ending up with four points. It was an evenly contested group so as favourite Belgium will be disappointed they didn't stand out. The Ukraine wanted good news no doubt but it wasn't to be. 11 goals (av 1.8).

F: Top team Portugal won the group but was surprisingly beaten by Georgia in the final match. That lifted them into the next round. With Turkey also going well, it was a hard working Czechia that missed out. 17 Goals (av2.8).


The group matches are now known and are shown below. None of the last 16 teams could say they have a soft game. The better rated sides are not firing on all cylinders and that means the lower ranked sides could force an upset or three. 























Sixteen: Germany and Switzerland advanced effortlessly while Spain overwhelmed a plucky Georgia. England were the one side to advance without conviction. A last gasp goal in regular time and a quick one into extra time saved them but otherwise, it was overly cautious. Slovakian players showed the merit of acting classes with repeated feigned injuries but to no avail. 

The Netherlands impressed in advancing to the last eight but neither France nor Portugal showed much fire power. Portugal showed penalties are their thing. Turkey battled to send an in form Austria home. 

Group E only had 1.8 goals per match and the group expired this round. Group C was even worse at 1.2 and that group survived only because of a late flurry by England. Two poor groups. Group B was the next lowest scoring group and is represented by one team, Spain.

Eight: Spain and Germany was a good match up with Spain producing the slightly better play and acting. Germany got an equaliser late to earn extra time but then Spain scored late in that win. The other match was a borefest in comparison. Two sides with little idea of how to score and neither did until penalties. 

On the other side of the draw.....


The historical chart is below and barely fits with slightly blurry, smaller fonts the result. Germany is the most successful nation with sis finals and three wins. Spain have three wins from four finals. France has had two wins from three final appearances but no other country has won more than one final. Russia (including the former USSR) has made three finals, all unsuccessful. They weren't invited in 2024. 

The old Czechoslovakia I included with Czechia results as the stronger of the two nations that emerged. I did the same with Croatia and the old Yugoslavia. Russia too with the USSR as already mentioned. 

Wednesday 3 July 2024

Copa América : 1975-2024

The Copa América has been around since 1916 but in 1975 it became a regular event with all South American major sides participating so a good place to start. From 1993 the practice of inviting countries from outside the region to join has been the norm, 2021 the exception. Australia and Qatar were to be the invitees that year but both had to pull out when rescheduling the event clashed with existing commitments.  

2024: The ten regular nations were joined by six invited sides. The invitees usually don't do well, México being the only outsider to make a final (twice without winning). So how did it all go?


A:
Argentina won as expected with three wins from three. Canada was a surprise qualifier with Chile and Perú both having disappointing tournaments. Scoring was muted, with no more than two goals in a match. 6 goals (av 1.0). 

B: Venezuela was a comfortable qualifier with three wins. Ecuador just got past México while Jamaica ended up just making up the numbers. Goal scoring was reasonably plentiful, one game even had four. 12 goals (av 2.0). 

C: A third group with the winner winning all three, this time it was Uruguay. Panamá came second to oust a poor USA side and Bolivia was all at sea (although landlocked). The teams had no trouble scoring. 19 goals (av 3.2). 

D: Colombia won the group, courtesy of a draw with Brazil in their final group match and Brazil drawing their first one against Costa Rica. Brazil still qualified at CR's expense. Paraguay was off the pace in this tournament. 16 goals (av 2.7). 



The first playoff was taken into extra time with a last gasp equaliser by Ecuador but they lost on penalties anyway. Of course, they weren't to know that. 


Historical results back to 1975 show that Brazil is the most successful nation. They are someway ahead of Argentina and Uruguay, which are neck and neck. Argentina refused to attend in 2001 due to perceived safety concerns. Canada also pulled out after the event was rescheduled. Costa Rica filled in for Canada and Honduras hastily threw a team together to cover for Argentina. Both did well at short notice. 

Brazil has won it six times, Argentina and Uruguay both three. Chile managed two when tournaments were played in consecutive years. Perú and Paraguay started well with trophies but not since. 

Monday 1 July 2024

Egypt: Teams Ranked - 1961 to 2023

Egypt is a strong football nation in Africa and that includes at club level. That's helped by having the talent mostly focused within a few clubs. The chart to the right shows success achieved domestically (Egy) and then with success in Africa being added (Tot).

So how do the points work? In the Premier League (Division 1) the top four are rewarded with 6, 3, 2 and 1. The Egypt Cup 4 and 2 points for the finalists only. In the African Champions League, it's 8, 4 and 2 points. 

The Premier League is dominated by the three clubs to the left. Since 2014 Al Ahly has won the title seven times and Zamalek the other three. The 2013 season wasn't completed due to a coup d'état .

Since 2013 only the top two listed have won the title. Zamalek seven times and Al Alhy four. The cup wasn't held in 2012 due to a deadly riot at a match.  

Egyptian success in the African Champions League has increased over this period. It started to get serious in the 1980's and Al Ahly in particular has dominated this decade so far.


All put together, the clubs are below. The grand total is shown for each club, divided into regions with a ranking number (Rk) which gives their place compared to all the other clubs. In some years there have been no tournaments held due to war, riots and political unrest but thankfully most seasons have been completed.

Cairo is a sprawling metropolis that has many clubs within its urban reach. 77.4% of all success is from that area. The East which basically runs down the Suez Canal and it claimed 12.5%. Alexandria (4.9%) Central (4.7%) and South (0.5%) make up the rest.